OBAMA 'S REQUEST- "I NEED ANOTHER $1.2 TRILLION IN FUNNY MONEY"

OBAMA’S REQUEST, “I NEED ANOTHER $1.2 TRILLION IN FUNNY MONEY” And funny money it is – being printed on the constantly running Federal Reserve printing press, and whatever isn’t printed is borrowed from China through the sale of worthless U. S. Treasury Bonds.

When Obama drags himself off the golf course and returns from his $4 million vacation, he will be asking Congress to increase the government’s debt limit by $1.2 trillion – again. This increase is the third step that was part of a deal approved back in August. The debt ceiling was increased $400 billion in August and $500 billion in September, and now $1.2 trillion will be asked for.

Now you would think there’d be a big fight in Congress over approving this increase. You’d think the Conservative Republicans would say hell, no, but you’d be oh, so wrong. The bill that was passed in August stated that Congress can only vote to block the debt ceiling increase with a “disapproval resolution.” This means after Obama requests the increase, lawmakers have only 15 days to vote it down. If Obama asks for the increase on January 1, Congress will have until January 14 to say “no.” But Congress will not be in session on January 14. They are in recess past that date. Oh, didn’t Obama plan this to perfection? Raise the debt ceiling now before Congress gets back to stop it. Isn’t he the clever one.

Once the debt ceiling is raised, the total amount Obama will be allowed to spend is $16.4 trillion. Want to know how bad this is? In eight years of the Bush administration our debt increased by $4 trillion. In the first 3 years of the Obama administration Obama has increased our debt $6 trillion.

So Congress can’t stop this madness. I’m not sure Boehner would have the guts to do it even if Congress were in session then. He’d probably flop, whine, whimper and waffle, and after a couple of weeks of press conferences he’d cave in.

Remember something, Folks. In over 1,000 days there has been no budget from Obama. He’s running the richest country on earth without a plan, a budget. No wonder he has to keep asking for more and more and more money. 

How do we know how much he is spending? We don’t. How do we know where he’s spending it? We don’t – except when the government backed Solyndras of the world go bust. We don’t know because there is no budget. He’s the sorriest excuse of a leader to ever occupy the White House. Vacation and golf are more important than creating a budget, decreasing our debt, and getting our financial house in order.
Want to know what Obama himself thought about raising the debt ceiling when Bush was in office? See it here. And remember this when you vote in 2012. Four more years of record spending, no cuts, no planned budget, raising the debt limit and passing Continuing Resolutions to run the country are the tools by which we will become Greece sooner rather than later. We are teetering on the precipice right now.

SCARES THE HECK OUT OF ME!

CLICK HERE TO GET THE LOW DOWN ON THE U.S. DEBT.

And then ask yourself if the so-called Debt Ceiling Deal just passed yesterday and today by the Washington Wackos is really a good deal. Keep in mind that the "Deal" gives Obama the Spender an additional 2.5 trillion to spend up to 2013 (oh, yes, past the 2012 election - how stupid can the Republicans be?) And in turn Obama has to decrease his "requested" spending by 2.5 trillion. Oh, no, he doesn't have to reduce CURRENT spending by 2.5 trillion to actually DECREASE our debt. He only has to decrease his REQUESTED spending by 2.5 trillion. When all is said and done we will still spend trillions more, putting us in debt trillions more, just 2.5 trillion less than His Highness really wants to spend. How can approving a spending increase of 2.5 trillion and at the same time requesting a spending decrease of 2.5 trillion not be a wash? And don't start yowling at me about Bush did this and Bush did that and Obama isn't responsible for the debt. The fact is Obama has increased the national debt approximately 30% in 2 1/2 years, and with the approval of Congress, The Beat Goes On. The Debt Deal?? It's Absolute Insanity!

The Lawyer's Party

I got an email with some information written by Bruce Walker*. That's what it says, though I don't know if the name is real. The stats listed are very interesting and I thought I'd share them with you.

Here you go:

The Democratic Party has become the Lawyers' Party. Barack Obama is a lawyer. Michelle Obama is a lawyer. Hillary Clinton is a lawyer. Bill Clinton is a lawyer. John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards is a lawyer.

Every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school, although Gore did not graduate. Every Dem. vice presidential nominee since 1976, except Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Look at leaders of the Dem Party in Congress. Harry Reid is a lawyer. Nancy Pelosi is a lawyer.

The Republican Party is different. President Bush is a businessman. VP Cheney is a businessman. Newt Gingrich was a history professor. Tom Delay was an exterminator. dick Armey was an economist. John Boehner was a plastic manufacturer. Bill Frist is a heart surgeon. Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford who left office 31 years ago.

The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work whom are often the targets of lawyers.

The Lawyers' Party sees these sorts of people who provide goods and serves that people want, as the enemies of America. Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail? Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value for our nation.

Today we are drowning in laws. We are contorted by judicial decisions. We are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all areas of our once private lives. America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place should be modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked.

When the most important decision for our president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme court the role of lawyers and the law in America is too broad.

When House Democrats sue America (Arizona) in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.

We cannot expect the Lawyers' party to provide real change, real reform or real hope in America. Americans know that a republic in which every major government action must be blessed by nine unelected judges is not what Washington intended in 1789. Americans know that we cannot fight a war when ACLU lawsuits snap at the heels of our defenders.

The U. S. has 5% of the worlds population and 66% of the worlds lawyers. Tort (legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits, such as spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you, and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits. This legislation has continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party. When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyer's Association goes to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high!

So there it is, Readers. I thought it was an interesting viewpoint. No wonder there is no TORT REFORM in OBAMACARE and the Dems fought the Reps attempts to include it.

SENATOR BOEHNER A TRAITOR? YOU BET!

John Boehner last week announced a Two-Point Economic Plan which included a spending freeze and a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts. Good idea, actually a GREAT idea, reduce spending and retain all of the Bush tax cuts. That's a great economic plan in a weak economy.

But what did Boehner say on Sunday? That he would support renewing tax cuts for the middle class but not the wealthy! Can you believe it? Changed his mind in less than a week. He is saying he will go along with the Obama proposal to extend the Bush tax cuts for everyone except the "wealthy." What in the world is wrong with Mr. Boehner?

The White House jumped all over these comments as a potential sign that the GOP might give up and back the Obama plan of no tax increases for the majority but large tax increases for the minority (that's the so-called "wealthy). With Boehner's stamp of approval the White House will now dig their heels in the mud and never agree to leave all of the Bush tax cuts in place.

John Boehner, we do not want increased taxes on the "wealthy." Whose definition of "wealthy" do you use? Who decides what is enough money to label a person "wealthy?" And this man is the House Republican Leader? JOHN BOEHNER NEEDS TO BE DE-ELECTED. How could he be so stupid??

The message from Americans is simple: NO TAX INCREASES, PERIOD, FOR ANYONE. We need less of Washington, not more, and we need more jobs, not less. Raising taxes on anyone will cause higher unemployment. This is a historical fact.

Remember, the Democrats are running scared from Obama's agenda, and the last thing the Republicans should do is cave in to the lunacy. They should be standing strong for lower taxes, smaller government, less spending, less regulation -- and TERM LIMITS.

THROW THEM OUT IN NOVEMBER, INCLUDING JOHN BOEHNER